Dylan Brogan
Absentee drop box in Madison
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling banning the use of drop boxes is one of four recent court decisions that have determined how voters will cast ballots in the Nov. 8 election.
Once upon a time, Wisconsin governors and legislators decided the rules for the next general election. The Legislature would pass new election-related changes, negotiate any needed compromise, and governors would sign those changes into law.
So much for the civics-textbook lessons of how a bill becomes a law.
That requires cooperation between the executive and legislative branches of government. But Democratic Gov. Tony Evers has vetoed every election-law change passed by Republicans who control the Legislature.
That means, in this election cycle, judges have instead decided what changes will be in place when voters on Nov. 8 elect a U.S. senator, eight U.S. House members, governor, attorney general, secretary of state, state treasurer, 16 state senators and 99 Assembly members.
Lawsuits have resulted in federal and state judges making four major changes in voting procedures.
On Sept. 7, Waukesha County Circuit Judge Michael Aprahamian ruled that local elections clerks can’t fill in — or “cure” — missing information on absentee ballot envelopes. The COVID pandemic caused a 2020 surge in absentee ballots, which require the signature of the voter casting it and the name and address of the witness watching it being filled out.
The Elections Commission had advised local clerks that state law gave them authority to fill in some missing information, but the Waukesha County Republican Party sued to overturn that interpretation.
On Aug. 31, U.S. District Judge James Peterson ruled that voters with disabilities can choose someone to help them return their ballots. The judge said the federal Voting Rights Act supersedes any conflicting state law.
On July 8, the state Supreme Court ruled that ballot “drop boxes” — unstaffed secure boxes where thousands of voters dropped off ballots at the height of the COVID pandemic in 2020 — are illegal and cannot be used on Nov. 8.
The justices also ruled that voters must drop off their ballots in person, but the federal judge voided that requirement for disabled voters.
The state Supreme Court also ordered on April 15 that a legislative redistricting plan drawn by Republican lawmakers be in place for the Nov. 8 elections. The court split 4-3, with Justice Brian Hagedorn casting the deciding vote. Hagedorn said a U.S. Supreme Court order forced him to accept the Legislature’s “race-neutral” map.
Rick Esenberg, president of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) that was in the middle of the fights over election-law changes, said judges corrected the excesses of state officials.
“Bureaucrats — not governors and legislators — took it upon themselves to rewrite election laws in ways they thought would be better,” Esenberg says.
“The law, passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor, does not permit curing absentee ballots or drop boxes. Federal law does require assistance to disabled voters that Wisconsin law does not provide for, but it may never have become an issue had WEC not issued a guidance that said everyone can have someone else return their ballots,” Esenberg adds.
“In fact, the Legislature passed a law that would have permitted this kind of assistance to disabled voters last April. But Governor Evers vetoed it. The only explanation is that he wants third-party ballot collection for all voters. Well, the law doesn’t permit it.”
Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause in Wisconsin, a nonprofit that monitors state government, disagrees.
WILL’s lawyers seek “to make it more difficult for disabled voters and voters in general to return absentee ballots either through ballot drop boxes or to have absentee ballots that have a minor witness address incompletion thrown out and not counted and have sought remedy through the courts because of the [Capitol] impasse,” Heck says.
Lawyers like Esenberg “think they can rely on a conservative majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court or friendly, sympathetic circuit court judges…to do their bidding through court venue ‘shopping’,” Heck adds.
Esenberg also said state judges drawing new legislative districts was not surprising.
“We always have districts drawn by the courts when we have divided government. Everyone knew that would happen,” Esenberg says. “The only thing that differs from recent Wisconsin history is that it was done by state courts.”
But former Democratic Senate Majority Leader Tim Cullen says the “only fair solution — regardless of which political party is in control — is the Iowa system of redistricting where for over 40 years, non-partisan state employees draw the maps without considering past election results and the legislature can only vote the maps up or down, but they cannot change or amend them.”
The legal fights continue. Last week, WILL sued in Waukesha County to stop WEC from being part of a federal voter-registration system.
Steven Walters started covering the Capitol in 1988. Contact him at stevenscotwalters@gmail.com.
