Tommy Washbush
Even by the anything-goes ethical code of the corporate jungle, Amazon.com's alpha male, Jeff Bezos, is considered a ruthless predator by businesses that deal with him. As overlord of Amazon, by far the largest online marketer in the world (with more sales than the next nine U.S. online retailers combined), Bezos has the monopoly power to stalk, weaken and even kill off retail competitors, going after such giants as Barnes & Noble and Wal-Mart and draining the lifeblood from hundreds of smaller Main Street shops.
He also goes for the throats of both large and small businesses that supply the millions of products his online behemoth sells. They're lured into Amazon by its unparalleled database of some 200 million customers, but once in, they face unrelenting pressure to lower what they charge Amazon for their products, compelled by the company to give it much better deals than other retailers can extract.
Lest you think that "predator" is too harsh a term, consider the metaphor that Bezos himself chose when explaining how to get small book publishers to cough up deep discounts as the price of getting their titles listed on the Amazon website.
As related by Businessweek reporter Brad Stone, Bezos instructed his negotiators to stalk them "the way a cheetah would pursue a sickly gazelle." Bezos' PR machine tried to claim that this sneering comment was just a little "Jeff joke," but they couldn't laugh it off, for a unit dubbed the "Gazelle Project" had actually been set up inside Amazon.
This top-level team focused on doing exactly what Bezos' metaphor instructed: Pursue vulnerable small publishers and squeeze their wholesale prices to Amazon down to the point of no profit, thus allowing the online retailer to underprice every other book peddler. When Stone exposed Gazelle last year in his book, The Everything Store, the project was suddenly rebranded with a bloodless name -- "Small Publisher Negotiation Program" -- but its mission remains the same.
Today, Amazon sells a stunning 40% of all new books, up from 12% five years ago. It is even more dominant in the digital book market, which is fast catching up to the sales level of physical books and is widely perceived as the future of publishing. Electronic book sales were nonexistent just seven years ago; today about a third of all books sold are e-books, and Amazon sells two-thirds of those. Of course, Amazon also owns Kindle, the largest-selling device for reading digital books.
With his market clout, deep-pocket financing and ferocious price-cutting, Bezos has forced hundreds of America's independent bookstores to close and has humbled the superstore book chains that once preyed on the independents and dominated the market. Borders, the second-largest chain, succumbed to bankruptcy in 2011. Now Barnes & Noble, the largest brick-and-mortar bookstore, is stumbling. It has lost millions of dollars, closed dozens of stores, shrunk most others, and suffered the embarrassment of its own board chairman frantically dumping big chunks of Barnes & Noble stock.
Bezos' online empire not only stands alone as the paramount bookseller, but is also the dominant price setter, the arbiter of which titles get the best access (or none) to the biggest number of buyers, the most powerful reviewer of books, the publisher of its own line of books, the keeper of an in-house stable of writers -- and even the sponsor of a major book prize.
He achieved this the old-fashioned way: brute force.
While it's true that Amazon is innovative, efficient and focused on customer satisfaction, such factors alone did not elevate the company to its commanding level of market control. To reach that pinnacle, Bezos followed the path mapped by Rockefeller and other 19th century robber barons: 1) ruthlessly exploit a vast and vulnerable low-wage workforce; 2) extract billions of dollars in government subsidies; and 3) wield every anticompetitive weapon you can find or invent to get what you want from other businesses.
A phantasmagoric mall
Through doing all of the above, Bezos has applied his cheetah business model to nearly everything retail. Amazon's massive book dominion is now dwarfed by its annexation of dozens of other markets -- book sales make up a mere 7% of Amazon's total business. Amazon has already captured more than a third of all online sales with a website that's a phantasmagoric mall of unimaginable size, containing what amounts to hundreds of virtual superstores.
In the process, and with the same deeply discounted prices it used to conquer the book business, Amazon has poached millions of customers from neighborhood shops and suburban malls. The chase for cheap has been great for Amazon, but it is proving intolerably expensive for your and my hometowns. Our local businesses lose customers and have to close, local workers lose jobs and local economies lose millions of consumer dollars that Amazon siphons into its faraway coffers. What makes that even more intolerable is that much of Amazon's competitive advantage has been ill-gotten.
Bezos would not have grabbed such market dominance if government had not been subsidizing his sales with special tax breaks for 20 years. In all but a handful of states, merchants are obliged by law to collect city and state sales taxes from everyone who buys stuff from them. But Amazon, as an online merchant, has avoided adding these taxes to the price that its customers pay.
Bezos has emphatically insisted from the start that Amazon's only facility is its headquarters in Washington state, claiming therefore that Amazon's sales in the other 49 states are exempt from sales taxes -- even though he racks up billions of dollars in sales in those states and even though Amazon has massive warehouses in about half of them. With legalistic hocus-pocus, Bezos asserts that the warehouses are independent contractors, not part of Amazon.
The tax subsidy ranges from about 4% to more than 10% across the country, handing Bezos an advantage of several billion dollars a year to underwrite his fast and vast expansion.
Amazon's tax ploy has been key to its ability to undercut the prices of local retailers, forcing many of them out of business. And the tax dodge has also shortchanged our communities by eliminating billions in tax revenues that cities and states desperately need for schools, infrastructure, parks and other public services.
During the past couple of years, 21 states , including Wisconsin, have stopped playing the fool, finally requiring Amazon to collect sales taxes like its competitors do. In a study released earlier this year, the National Bureau of Economic Research analyzed retail data of five of these states and found that Amazon's sales plummeted by nearly 10% after it started charging sales tax. It was saving the cost of sales tax -- not any Bezos "magic" -- that kept many customers buying from his online mall. Of course, that's cold comfort to the retailers driven out of business during two decades of Amazon's government-backed assault.
Amazon's amazing slice-and-dice tax machine not only avoids paying state taxes, it also extracts tax money from states to expand its warehouse network. This supremely rich company says that states wanting the jobs that come with its warehouses must show Amazon the money, i.e., offer "incentive grants" or tax breaks.
Amazon is receiving some $17 million in tax incremental financing from the city of Kenosha for a new distribution center that is expected to open in 2015. It has also asked for $5 million for a second distribution center in the area. And the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation has authorized Amazon to receive up to $10.3 million in state tax credits for the facilities.
The Amazon crush
Having overweening market power means never having to say you're sorry -- even to your owners. Beyond taxpayer subsidies, Bezos can afford to be a voracious predator because his Wall Street investors have allowed him to keep operating without returning a profit.
On paper, his revenue-generating machine has lost billions of dollars, yet his major investors, enamored of Amazon's takeover of one consumer market after another, haven't pulled the plug. Amazon uses its capital to buy its competitors and/or to market its own version of competitors' products, which it then sells at a loss in order to squeeze hapless competitors out of business. That's the very definition of predatory pricing.
Brad Stone's book gives a chilling example of one such predation. Amazon has its own corporate espionage team called Competitive Intelligence that tracks rivals. In 2009, CIAmazon spotted a fast-rising online seller of one particular baby product: Diapers.com. A Bezos lieutenant was dispatched to inform the diaper honchos that the cheetah was going into that business, so they should just sell their firm to it. No thanks, replied the upstart.
Amazon promptly responded to the rebuff by marketing another line of diapers, with a price discount of 30%. It kept dropping the price even lower (plus free shipping) when the smaller firm tried to fight back. Diapers.com's investors grew antsy, and in September 2010, the two founders of the company met with Bezos himself and surrendered. The final blow was their discovery that Bezos, in his campaign to crush them and control the market of online diaper sales, was on track to lose $100 million in just three months.
Showrooming
Small retailers everywhere are experiencing an ugly practice dubbed "showrooming." Shoppers come in, check out the merchandise, ask a lot of questions and leave without buying anything. But first they use their smartphones to scan the barcode of a product they like. Then they go online and buy it from Amazon at a discounted price, lower than the wholesale price.
Amazon's new smartphone, called Fire, is specifically designed to make showrooming fast and easy. Amazon has even offered $5 rebates to shoppers who scan items at stores, then buy them online. This is corporate murder.
Amazon also shows no mercy to companies that provide the products it sells. You'd think this would be a felicitous, symbiotic relationship, but when the market grows into a virtual monopoly, the monopolist can turn on suppliers with a vengeance. Amazon has done precisely that to book publishers.
While Amazon's fight with international publishing giant Hachette has been well publicized, it's medium-sized and small publishers who are especially vulnerable. They don't have splashy marketing budgets, so they're largely dependent on access to the buyers coming to Amazon's online market.
"I offered them a 30% discount," the head of a small academic publishing house told The New York Times this year. "They demanded 40." After she acquiesced to that, the cheetah soon came back, demanding 45. "Where do I find that five percent?" she asks. "Amazon may be able to operate at a loss, but I'm not in a position to do that."
"I wake up every single day knowing Amazon might make new, impossible demands."
Stacy Mitchell, an intrepid researcher with the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, has been studying Amazon's impact and rightly says that to avoid a sterile Amazonian future, we must force "a public conversation about their power." Unlike Wal-Mart, Amazon is largely invisible to most people. As Mitchell puts it: "All you really see is the website and then the FedEx guy is there."